Event 1102 is evidence, not an absence of evidence
It names the account that cleared the log and the moment they did it. That timestamp bounds the window and, here, the account it names is the one created twenty-three minutes earlier.
At 04:18 an account was created on the Northwind domain controller and added to Administrators, a service followed, and at 04:41 the Security log was cleared by that same account. Reconstruct what the clearing was meant to hide, contain the controller, and record the anti-forensics.
Mission brief · H-307
the break-glass IR account `svc-ir`, checked out of the vault for this incident — never the compromised identity
The detection fired in the EDR console. You opened a live-response session from that detection, so your shell rides the EDR agent channel — containing the host will *not* cut you off, which is exactly why you contain from here rather than over SSH.
EDR console (detections + live response)
Endpoint detection & response
Live-response shell on the affected host
Host shell session
The affected host
Owner: The system's business owner, named on the asset record
Containing a host you haven't identified can stop revenue. Check criticality and owner before you isolate anything.
You may act alone
Ask a human first
A cleared Security log is not a dead end — it is itself an event, with a time and an account attached. This case teaches how to work a domain controller after the adversary tried to erase the record, and why the clearing is often the most useful finding in the report.
It names the account that cleared the log and the moment they did it. That timestamp bounds the window and, here, the account it names is the one created twenty-three minutes earlier.
Account creation on its own is routine; creation followed by a group-add to Administrators is the privilege escalation. Correlate them, then check whether the creating account itself was already compromised.
Authentication for the estate depends on it. The action passes an approval gate; the admin jump host stays up pending session review rather than being isolated on suspicion.
The service, the Run key, the scheduled task and the staged directory copy are all still there. Persistence outlives the log the operator deleted.
The reference response, executed by the same engine that grades your attempt. Yours will differ — the rubric reads end state and evidence, not the shape of your workflow.
Gate approved — 100%
22 of 22 rubric rules hold.
Gate denied — 87%
Refusing the consequential action is a defensible choice with a measured cost; the difference is what the lab is teaching.
A stolen admin session on the domain controller creates an account, promotes it to Administrators, installs a service that beacons out, and clears the Security log to hide the sequence.
| Technique | Name | Tactic |
|---|---|---|
| T1136.001 | Create Account: Local Account | Persistence |
| T1098 | Account Manipulation | Persistence |
| T1543.003 | Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service | Persistence |
| T1070.001 | Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs | Defense Evasion |
| T1071.001 | Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols | Command and Control |
The workflow reached a terminal success state on the graded run.
behavior · weight 20 · T1136.001 Create Account: Local Account (Persistence)
A consequential action passed through a human approval gate.
safety · weight 15 · T1136.001 Create Account: Local Account (Persistence)
No non-idempotent operation was retried without an idempotency key.
efficiency · weight 10 · T1070.001 Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (Defense Evasion)
Every action node resolves its secret from the vault, never an inline field.
configuration · weight 10 · T1071.001 Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (Command and Control)
The learner attached at least one linkable piece of evidence to the case.
investigation · weight 10 · T1098 Account Manipulation (Persistence)
The case carries an analyst closure note explaining the outcome.
explanation · weight 10 · T1136.001 Create Account: Local Account (Persistence)
No innocent asset in the alert batch was contained, disabled or revoked.
behavior · weight 15 · T1071.001 Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (Command and Control)
The playbook survived the integration faults it met and still finished.
configuration · weight 15 · T1070.001 Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (Defense Evasion)
Nothing was changed in the estate before evidence had been gathered.
investigation · weight 10 · T1098 Account Manipulation (Persistence)
The analyst worked the domain controller directly instead of grading the alert text.
investigation · weight 10 · T1136.001 Create Account: Local Account (Persistence)
The analyst can name the event that proves the audit log was cleared.
investigation · weight 10 · T1070.001 Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (Defense Evasion)
The rogue administrator account was identified from creation and group-add events.
investigation · weight 10 · T1136.001 Create Account: Local Account (Persistence)
The external peer was proven from the controller's own socket table.
investigation · weight 10 · T1071.001 Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (Command and Control)
The live beacon was identified by PID before anything was contained.
behavior · weight 10 · T1071.001 Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (Command and Control)
The scheduled task that re-arms the implant was found despite its plausible name.
behavior · weight 10 · T1053.005 Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task (Persistence)
The compromised domain controller is isolated at end state.
behavior · weight 15 · T1543.003 Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (Persistence)
The rogue administrator account is disabled at end state.
behavior · weight 10 · T1098 Account Manipulation (Persistence)
The machine-wide Run key persistence was recorded, so eradication is complete.
explanation · weight 10 · T1547.001 Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder (Persistence)
A post-incident timeline was filed: stolen session, account creation, promotion, service install, log clear, containment.
explanation · weight 15 · T1070.001 Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (Defense Evasion)
The analyst scoped the host's network from the wire, so containment decisions know which segment is in play.
investigation · weight 5
The analyst scoped the machine itself, so memory-hungry triage steps are planned against real capacity rather than a guess.
investigation · weight 3
Disk capacity was taken from the volume itself, which is what makes an image or memory-dump decision defensible.
investigation · weight 3
Vocabulary is generated from the teaching profiles, so it always matches what the consoles render.
| Concept | Cortex Forge | Summit SOAR | Storyline |
|---|---|---|---|
| artifact | Indicator | Artifact | Record |
| case | Incident | Container | Case |
| approval | Manual task | Prompt | Page |
| note | War Room entry | Note | Case note |
The same reference to an enrichment node's verdict, written three ways:
The consoles you practice in use teaching names. These are the words the real vendors print in their own documentation, so the vocabulary survives the day you sit in front of a production tenant.
| Concept | Cortex XSOARXSOAR 8.x | Splunk SOARSplunk SOAR 6.x (formerly Phantom) | TinesTines (2026 cloud) | Microsoft Sentinel + Logic AppsSentinel (Defender portal, 2026) | Google SecOps SOARSecOps SOAR (formerly Siemplify) | Swimlane TurbineTurbine (2026) | Torq HyperautomationTorq (2026) | IBM QRadar SOARQRadar SOAR (Resilient) 51.x | ServiceNow Security OperationsSecOps (Flow Designer era) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| artifact | Indicator | Artifact (CEF fields) | Event payload field | Entity | Entity | Field / correlation value | Event field | Artifact | Observable |
| case | Incident | Container | Case | Incident | Case | Record | Case | Incident | Security incident (SIR) |
| approval | Manual (data collection) task | Prompt block | Page (form) / Send to Chat | Approval action (Teams / email) | Manual action | Task / approval action | Approval step (Torq Chat / Slack) | Manual task / phase gate | Approval activity |
| note | War Room entry | Note | Case note | Comment | Case wall comment | Comment | Case comment | Note | Work note |
When the record has been tampered with, pivot to sources the adversary did not control: disk artifacts, network sessions and off-host log forwarding.